Triple A Weekly Newsletter
Triple A
learning News Letter – 3
UK News
Is the minimum
wage starting to bite?
A lobby group on behalf of employers in the retail
industry have said that the forthcoming increase in the minimum wage will
cost retail jobs. The UK minimum wage is set to increase from £5.05 to £5.35
an hour next month.
In a submission to the Low Pay Commission they urged
the government to delay the latest rise. They fear that 78,000 jobs will be
lost in the retail sector.
But the claims have sparked a row with unions who say
employers are using the threat of job losses to hold back pay.
"Retailers tell us they are being expected to find
£2.7bn extra for wages over just two years," said Kevin Hawkins of the
research group and companies can afford a rise.
He warned that with rental, energy and other charges
"shooting up" some employers are looking to cut staffing costs.
But the TUC dismissed the claims, arguing that official
figures showed a different picture and that 23,000 retail jobs had been
created over the past two years.
"Every year members of the British Retail
Consortium predict that an increase in the minimum wage will cause massive
job losses and they are proven wrong," said TUC chief Brendan Barber.
The Transport & General Workers Union (T&G)
argued that there needed to be a "bold rise" - to at least £6 an
hour - in the national minimum wage in order to battle poverty and
inequality.
"Retail is one of the lowest paying sectors yet
Tesco, for example, has reported £2.35bn profit, 17% higher than last
year," said T&G general secretary Tony Woodley.
"Companies can afford a rise, and workers deserve
it."
Questions
- Explain
what is meant by the term ‘national minimum wage’.
- Why
might employers fear that an increase in the minimum wage might lead to
job losses?
- In
what ways can employees try to increase their chances of receiving this
increase in minimum wage?
- The
minimum wage is part of the EU Social Contract, what other rights for
workers are contained in this document?
EU News
Are
the Swiss moving towards joining the EU?
The decision by the Swiss people
to allow labour from the 10 new EU members to enter the country could be
taken as yet another move towards integration of the mainland Europe and
maybe even eventual entry of the EU by the Swiss. The labour accord is part
of a series of agreements approved by voters in 2000 between Switzerland and
the then-15 nation EU. It was meant to be extended automatically to new EU
members, but opponents to the deal collected enough signatures to force a
referendum on the issue. Under the plans, citizens of eight Eastern European
countries as well as Cyprus and Malta, will be able to travel and work
freely in Switzerland. However, the Swiss will apply quotas on the numbers
coming until 2011. Swiss citizens will also be allowed to work and settle in
the new EU countries. Switzerland is not part of the EU, but the EU bloc is
its main trading partner and the government has been seeking closer
integration with Brussels. Swiss voters have now backed a plan to join a
European passport-free zone.
Some questions
1.
What essential
principles of EU membership does the above vote represent?
2.
Outline the advantages
of the single market for a member state.
3.
Why do some member
states still not want to enter the ‘single currency’?
4.
Which other countries
are considering applying for membership to the EU and when?
An overview of Hungary:
With this new member
of the EU featuring in a recent scandal at government level it might be a
good time to take a closer look at Hungary.
An
overview
Annual
data
|
2002(a)
|
Historical
averages (%)
|
1998-2002
|
Population
(m)
|
10.1
|
Population
growth
|
-0.3
|
GDP
(US$ bn; market exchange rate)
|
65.8
|
Real
GDP growth
|
4.3
|
GDP
(US$ bn; PPP)
|
136.0
|
Real
domestic demand growth
|
5.0
|
GDP
per head (US$; market exchange rate)
|
6,530
|
Inflation
|
9.7
|
GDP
per head (US$; purchasing power parity)
|
13,486
|
Current-account
balance/GDP
|
-4.7
|
Exchange
rate (av) Ft:US$
|
257.9
|
FDI
inflows/GDP
|
3.7
|
Background
Hungary was proclaimed a “workers’ and peasants’ state” in 1949. A
rebellion in 1956 against communist rule was crushed by the Soviet Union. In
the 1960s Hungary embarked on a series of economic reforms towards a
market-based system, but there was little political liberalisation and
reforms flagged. Janos Kadar’s government fell in May 1988 and free
elections were finally held in March and April 1990. Reform-minded centre-right
and centre-left coalitions have alternated in power since then, transforming
Hungary into a fully functioning market economy.
Political structure
Hungary is a multiparty democracy. The unicameral parliament has 386
members: 176 from single-member constituencies, 140 from regional lists and
70 from a national list. The president, who is elected by parliament, has
little power.
Policy issues
Hungary’s centre-left government continues to pursue the structural
reforms required by EU membership, set for May 2004. It is also committed to
the promotion of growth. However, it is constrained by a large fiscal
deficit, which must be reined in if Hungary is to join the EU’s economic
and monetary union (EMU) before the end of the decade. Since June, the
National Bank of Hungary (NBH, the central bank) has raised interest rates
by 6 percentage points in defence of the forint and long-term inflation
targets related to EMU.
Taxation
The corporate tax rate on reinvested profit is set to fall to 16% in 2004
after nine years of being levied at 18%. Automatic tax incentives for
foreign-owned and joint-venture companies have been eliminated. A two-tier
value-added tax (VAT) system has been in place since January 1st 1993. The
current basic VAT rate is 25%, with a preferential rate of 12% for food,
energy and some other items (this rate is set to rise to 15%). The rate for
the employers’ social security contribution was reduced from 33% to 31% in
2001, and to 29% in January 2002.
Foreign trade
After the fall of communism, there was a reorientation of trade to the West,
with around three-quarters of Hungary’s exports now directed to the EU.
Hungary ran large current-account deficits in the mid-1990s, but external
balances improved along with export competitiveness. In 1998-2001 the
current-account deficit showed steady improvement, but this changed in
2002-03, as wage increases outpaced productivity growth, and demand in the
EU stagnated.
Major
exports 2002
|
%
of total
|
Major
imports 2002
|
%
of total
|
Machinery
& equipment
|
58.7
|
Machinery
& equipment
|
52.0
|
Other
manufactures
|
30.9
|
Other
manufactures
|
35.5
|
Food,
beverages & tobacco
|
6.8
|
Fuels
& electricity
|
7.5
|
Raw
materials
|
2.0
|
Food,
beverages & tobacco
|
3.0
|
Fuels
& electricity
|
1.6
|
Raw
materials
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
Leading
markets 2002
|
%
of total
|
Leading
suppliers 2002
|
%
of total
|
Germany
|
33.7
|
Germany
|
23.9
|
Austria
|
8.2
|
Austria
|
7.7
|
Italy
|
5.4
|
Italy
|
7.5
|
France
|
5.2
|
Russia
|
6.0
|
2002
GDP
per head ($ at PPP)
|
8,230
|
8,890
|
9,470
|
9,930
|
GDP
(% real change pa)
|
4.17
|
5.15
|
3.80
|
3.30
|
Government
consumption (% of GDP)
|
10.15
|
9.84
|
11.00
|
11.05
|
Budget
balance (% of GDP)
|
-3.20
|
-3.48
|
-5.15
|
-9.65
|
Consumer
prices (% change pa; av)
|
9.99
|
9.82
|
9.16
|
5.29
|
Public
debt (% of GDP)
|
61.21
|
55.53
|
54.04
|
60.45
|
Labour
costs per hour (USD)
|
1.81
|
1.73
|
1.95
|
2.48
|
Recorded
unemployment (%)
|
6.95
|
6.38
|
5.71
|
5.82
|
Current-account
balance/GDP
|
-5.11
|
-6.25
|
-3.39
|
-4.27
|
Foreign-exchange
reserves (m$)
|
10,954
|
11,190
|
10,727
|
10,349
|
Useful
Web sites
http://www.budapestsun.com/
An
English language newspaper published in Budapest
http://www.ssees.ac.uk/hungary.htm
University
of London site relating to Hungary
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3595155.stm
A complete A-Z
of ALL EU terms
An example of which follows with a clear explanation of
Qualified Majority Voting
The Council of Ministers has two ways of taking
decisions - unanimity, when everyone has to be in agreement - and qualified
majority voting - a system of weighted votes.
QMV is the most common method of decision-making, used
in all but the most sensitive issues.
Issues which are decided on by QMV are also voted on by
the European Parliament. This means that the council and parliament act
together in co-decision.
Under QMV, each member state is given a certain number
of votes in the council, weighted according to its size and population. For
example, Germany, the EU's largest state, has 10 votes, while Portugal has
five and Finland three.
At present, there are 87 votes in the council,
distributed between the 15 member states.
The qualified majority means that 62 votes are needed
to pass a proposal, rather than the normal majority of 44.
At least half the population of the EU and half the
member states must also be in favour of a motion for it to pass.
A brief guide to
EU Institutions
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/europe/04/eu_institutions/html/introduction.stm
For example The Council of Ministers
Council of Ministers
The Council of Ministers is the EU institution which
represents the EU member states. It is a many-headed creature and may bring
together government ministers from each country, heads of government,
ambassadors, or merely government officials.
A summit meeting of heads of government is known as a
European Council, while a meeting of ambassadors (or permanent
representatives as they are termed) goes under the name Coreper.
Many decisions are made by officials meeting in
technical committees and are then merely rubber-stamped by ministers.
Unlike the Commission, the Council of Ministers is not
a supranational body but an intergovernmental one.
It should not be confused with the European Council,
which is the name given to the regular meetings - sometimes called summits -
of the EU member states' heads of state or government.
Regional and Cohesion Policy – 2007-2013.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/2007/osc/index_en.htm
The document that shows in detail the proposals for the
Regional Policy scheduled for 2007 – 2013.
International News
World Bank hopes on debt
relief
The World Bank hopes
that in coming months it can begin to get the rich countries of the world to
reduce the debts owed by the poorest nations on the planet.
The first part of the
Bank’s plan will the cancelling $40bn (£22bn) in debt owed to
international lenders by poorer nations, mostly in Africa.
So, just how much do
the poorest countries in Africa owe?
At July's G8 summit
in Gleneagles agreed in principle to cancel the debts of 18 of the world's
poorest and most heavily indebted nations. But since then little has been
heard of who will receive the much promised debt relief and with developed
economies now facing oil price increases some fear that the money and the
political will may no longer be there for the promises made in the summer.
Some questions
- Distinguish between (a) bi-later aid and (b)
multi-lateral aid.
- In what ways can major lenders reduce the debt
burden incurred on a country?
- Why is debt such a problem to the economies of
Africa?
- ‘Business is the way forward for developing
economies’ was first put forward by Bauer over 30 years ago. Why do
some economists believe that aid does not really benefit poor economies?
An
examination question
Business
Studies AS – Marketing
Sony
to cut price of PlayStation 3
Sony
is to cut the Japanese cost of its forthcoming PlayStation 3 console by 20%,
the consumer. The price cut is aimed at boosting the launch of the machine
and making it more competitive with the Xbox 360. The price for the North
American and European launch will stay the same.
The
surprise move will see the 20 gigabyte version of the PS3 sell for 49,980
yen ($430) when it goes on sale in November in Japan. No changes to the
price of the higher end model - 60GB version - or European and US prices
were announced.
In
the US, the system with a 20GB hard drive will cost $499, while a model with
a 60GB drive will cost $599. European pricing is 499 and 599 euros
respectively. The new Japanese price puts the console in the same range as
the basic Xbox 360 machine combined with an add-on HD-DVD player, which cost
49,600 yen together.
Sony
hopes the price cut will deflect criticism after a series of delays to the
PlayStation 3 console, concerns about price and apathy from some gamers
about the capabilities of the machine.
When
the new console is released in November it will compete with Microsoft's
Xbox 360 and the Nintendo Wii. Nintendo's new console will cost 25,000 yen
or lower in Japan and $250 (£133) or less in the US, while Microsoft's Xbox
360, which went on sale last November, starts at $299 in the US and £209 in
the UK.
Previously,
Sony had said that only the top end 60GB model would come with the
connector. Senior Executives said that they were keen to show consumers that
their ‘marketing mix’ was an attractive one and that price alone did not
determine customer choice.
He
said that it had now become apparent that there was a need for the high
definition capability.
Questions
- Explain what is meant
by the term ‘marketing mix’. ( 5 marks)
- Why might Sony have
decided to cut the price of the PlayStation 3 in Japan by 20%? ( 10
marks)
- In what other ways
might Sony try to compete against its main rival on other factors than
price? ( 15 marks)
Total
30 marks
Don’t
forget the SKILLS needed to do
well at AS Business Studies.
CONTENT
– know the topic and be able to show your understanding
APPLICATION
– be able to show your KNOWLEDGE in the context of the question
ANALYSIS
– be able to ask questions about what
has happened, such as what, why, who or where and work towards making a
decision. You are looking for CAUSES
and EFFECTS.
EVALUATION
– be able to make a judgement or an
opinion and support this both from the Case Study material and your business
knowledge.
Some
guide answers
- Marketing mix: The
marketing mix is the balance
of marketing techniques (1) required for selling the product.
It's components are often known as the four P's. The first is PRICE
- the price of the product.(1) The second is PRODUCT - the nature of the product itself.(1) The third is
PROMOTION - the promotional methods used to sell the
product(1) and the fourth is PLACE
- the distribution of the product(1)
- Sony might have decided
to cut their price in Japan to (a) be more competitive against their
major rivals – Xbox 300 and Nintendo Wii both of which are currently
cheaper than the Sony PlayStation 3. They had wanted to aim at the top
end of the market, with free connector but may be their research was
wrong and the market is more price centred than they had thought. They
will also want to deflect criticism from potential customers who have
been let down by delayed launch dates. (Boards normally award 3 marks
for each well described, in context and developed responses to this type
of question. S0 3x3 + 1 mark for the quality of answer, use of
material).
- Sony might have gone
for an inclusive package that gave customers all they needed for a self
contained console. They might have added more games or offered more GB
power ( 5). They seem to have recognised the need for high definition
facilities and they may have focused more on the other P’s and not
made price the ‘battle ground’ for this product.(3) The product
could have been made to be the most technically advanced in the market,
whilst its distribution could have wider and more readily available
through both conventional retail outlets and online buying.(5) They
might have decided to promote more visibly and may be product link to
personalities or a current film release. (2). In this answer you need to
be able to show the examiner that you can use your business knowledge to
develop a sensible course of action for Sony – always keeping it in
context and supporting with business logic why your idea might have been
put into action by Sony.
The four Ps – should they be increased to 7?
The 4 P’s
Product:
The Product management and Product marketing aspects of marketing deal with
the specifications of the actual good or service, and how it relates to the
end-user's needs and wants.
Pricing:
This refers to the process of setting a price for a product, including
discounts.
Promotion:
This includes advertising, sales promotion, publicity, and personal selling,
and refers to the various methods of promoting the product, brand, or
company.
Placement
or distribution refers to how the product gets to the customer; for example,
point of sale placement or retailing. This fourth P has also sometimes been
called Place, referring to “where” a product or service is sold, e.g. in
which geographic region or industry, to which segment (young adults,
families, business people, women, men, etc.).
May be now it’s the 7 P’s?
People:
Any person coming into contact with customers can have an impact on overall
satisfaction. Whether as part of a supporting service to a product or
involved in a total service, people are particularly important because, in
the customer's eyes, they are generally inseparable from the total service.
As a result of this, they must be appropriately trained, well motivated and
the right type of person. Fellow customers are also sometime referred to
under 'people', as they too can affect the customer's service experience,
(e.g., at a sporting event).
Process:
This is the process(es) involved in providing a service and the behaviour of
people, which can be crucial to customer satisfaction.
Physical
evidence: Unlike a product, a service cannot be experienced before it is
delivered, which makes it intangible. This, therefore, means that potential
customers could perceive greater risk when deciding whether or not to use a
service. To reduce the feeling of risk, thus improving the chance for
success, it is often vital to offer potential customers the chance to see
what a service would be like. This is done by providing physical evidence,
such as case studies, or testimonials.
Letter
from an Economist
Are
new battle lines being drawn?
There is little doubt that in
the coming decade the most important economic relationship in the global
economy will be that between the US and China. The current US treasury
Secretary has made over 70 visits to China and he will soon visit again;
this time to lobby for a reduction in the external value of yuan.
The lack of flexibility in
the value of the Yuan is considered to be a major cause of the continuing
trade deficit being experienced by the EU.
Before he reached Beijing Mr Paulson, the US Treasury Secretary will
stop over in Singapore and address the Finance Ministers of the G& . Mr
Paulson is under intense pressure from his domestic manufacturing sector to
persuade the Chinese government to devalue the yuan. Some of those putting
pressure on Paulson think that the yuan is as much as 40% undervalued.
China recently posted a $220
billion record trade surplus with the US and trends suggest that 2006 will
record an even larger sum.
As well as pushing for a
currency re-alignment Paulson is also going to Beijing to argue that piracy
is also causing problems to genuine manufacturers all over the world. The
IMF has also spoken of currency re-alignment for China and questioned its
ability to maintain growth with its current exchange rate. It also noted
that full capacity may be as little as two years away and then inflationary
pressures may start to appear.
Chinese officials say it is
wrong to blame them for this currency and trade imbalance. They point to globalisation and macroeconomic policies of
other large trading countries as the real causes of the problems now facing
the US.
In July 2005 China did relent
and dropped the yuan by 2.1% and the currency has appreciated by 2% since
then.
Paulson is on a tough mission
and knows that China favours gradual reductions in the value of its exchange
rate but he also has an increasing ‘protectionist’ lobby emerging in
Washington. It’s mid-term election year and Senators are scared of job
losses in their state.
The Chinese also will need to pragmatic for a fall in exports may lead to a
rise in unemployment and with many people now seeking more democracy in this
the world’s most populous nation the power brokers in Beijing do not want
disgruntled workers airing their opinions of the state and its ability to
manage the economy.
China’s competitive
advantage is certainly much greater than the 2% lobbyists are asking them to
drop the value of the yuan but it is unlikely that the Chinese government
will accept anything more.
The ‘contest’ that is now
emerging could be but a foretaste of the battles for economic dominance that
will flavour the coming decade.
|